Can Virtual Replace In-person Coaching? Experimental Evidence on Teacher Professional Development and Student Learning in South Africa
Resource type
Report
Authors/contributors
- Cilliers, Jacobus (Author)
- Fleisch, Brahm (Author)
- Kotzé, Janeli (Author)
- Mohohlwane, Nompumelelo (Author)
- Taylor, Stephen (Author)
- Thulare, Tshegofatso D. (Author)
Title
Can Virtual Replace In-person Coaching? Experimental Evidence on Teacher Professional Development and Student Learning in South Africa
Abstract
Virtual communication holds the promise of enabling low-cost professional development at scale, but the benefits of in-person interaction might be difficult to replicate. We report on an experiment in South Africa comparing on-site with virtual coaching of public primary school teachers. After three years, on-site coaching improved students' English oral language and reading proficiency (0.31 and 0.13 SD, respectively). Virtual coaching had a smaller impact on English oral language proficiency (0.12 SD), no impact on English reading proficiency, and an unintended negative effect on home language literacy. Classroom observations show that on-site coaching improved teaching practices, and virtual coaching led to larger crowding-out of home language teaching time. Implementation and survey data suggest technology itself was not a barrier to implementation, but rather that in-person contact enabled more accountability and support.
Date
2021-01-07
Call Number
openalex: W3104046477
Extra
DOI: 10.35489/bsg-rise-wp_2020/050
openalex: W3104046477
mag: 3104046477
Citation
Cilliers, J., Fleisch, B., Kotzé, J., Mohohlwane, N., Taylor, S., & Thulare, T. D. (2021). Can Virtual Replace In-person Coaching? Experimental Evidence on Teacher Professional Development and Student Learning in South Africa. https://doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-wp_2020/050
Link to this record